Chilcot Enquiry Conundrums
The Chilcot enquiry has been getting a lot of press in the last few days, and I thought I'd weigh in with my take on the whole idea of 'Government Secrets vs Democracy'.
Well why not?
It's our country, our democracy, our lives, and our reputations as a nation, and we are the employers, paying the wages of these leaders - he who pays the piper calls the tune.
But you may ask, 'Isn't it necessary for Government leaders to maintain the secrecy of their confidential conversations at least during their lifetimes?'
I'd say it is only required by unscrupulous, or if we want to be kind, misguided leaders, who want to protect themselves and/or our allies from criticism.
But they are all leaders of democratic countries, and should be held accountable to their own electorate, as well as the international community.
And if there is nothing questionable we might object to, then why hide it?
The fact that they try is in itself a matter of concern.
The evolution of democracy vs Russell Brand's revolution
Russell Brand pointed out a few powerful truths to Jeremy Paxman the other day, but I believe evolution rather than revolution is needed here.
So, how are our need to know and evolution connected?
To mature, evolve and develop our democracy, voters must have the opportunity to judge their government's performance.
In order to ensure that this happens, the electorate must be properly informed of how important decisions have been made, so they can they decide the future direction of government and vote for it intelligently?
I'm going to make a presumption here and suggest that we would like to be ethically or morally honest and open, rather than duplicitous and dishonest in our dealings with other countries and between ourselves.
That would be an evolution of civilised society.
Political dishonesty has had its day
We've all been disgusted by the dishonesty in British politics over the last few years, and in general we've been disillusioned for decades.
Ideally, if you can find any, I think the people would prefer the most pious and trustworthy people to lead the country.
Politicians unwilling to make this transition to honesty and openness should be dismissed.
Don't vote for them.
Those wishing to cover up their dishonest actions or questionable decisions should be revealed and punished.
It's time for Britain to lead the way again
Our mother of parliaments, our model of democracy, needs not only to be maintained, but to grow, to improve.
A digital age lends itself to a rapid advancement and evolution of democratic life for the benefit of everyone.
It is now very difficult to hide wrongdoing, and it is a sign of the natural progression of life on earth that all these unpleasant activities, going on behind closed doors in the name of security, are being revealed to a worldwide audience.
A more honest and open dialogue must begin between nations on the basis of mutual friendship and trust, and between national leaders and the people who elect them.
As digital communication becomes more instant and worldwide in its reach, we are losing our traditional boundaries. We are a global country now.
It is in the interests of all nations to see the rest of the world as family and proceed accordingly.
If we observe the changes taking place all over the world today objectively, as if we are already looking back at history, it is clear that the nature of life is inexorably driving civilisation in this evolutionary, unifying direction.
British sense of fair play
This should not be seen as a call for a Russell Brand revolution, but rather an inspiration to restore the integrity and reputation of British democracy, to create something we can feel proud of.
Like our earlier British democratic foundations, this idea of openness, honesty and trust, in national and international politics, can also be of benefit to all countries.
And don't be so cynical as to suggest that this is a notion to bring back the empire. It is rather a matter of the continued development of culture and values.
We lent our culture and our democratic history to the USA.
In the field of ideas we have been the leaders, not the followers.
Right now, we should continue in that vein, and not be influenced by US government preferences about the importance of keeping secret the conversations of our leaders.
This is about our country, and our future direction as a nation, and as a leader of nations. This is a step we can embrace enthusiastically. One could even say, in the spirit of our ancestors.
We've done it before, so we can do it again
In the early days of our democracy only the upper classes were allowed to vote.
There was a time when women were denied voting rights because men were afraid of how they would vote.
Workers and women were purposely denied an academic education, or even the ability to read and write, because those in power were afraid of the consequences of allowing them greater knowledge, and its effect on their own ability to rule.
History has shown how misguided these views were.
There is nothing to fear from a better educated, fully informed electorate, who have a better grasp of how our leaders make decisions.
We need to know and judge the validity and value of these decisions made on behalf of us all.
The Price of a Better Democracy
Obviously, decisions we see as bad will affect the way we vote in the future, and we may punish those who abused our trust.
That is the price of allowing democracy to evolve.
New political parties will emerge, who will champion these inspiring evolutionary values, and old inflexible political dogmas, like the dinosaurs they are, will fade into oblivion.
It isn't a lot to ask, or a steep price to pay, to maintain our integrity, and the advancement of civilisation, and our children will certainly appreciate it, in fact they are probably the reason it is happening now.